Sun System Handbook - ISO 3.4 June 2011 Internal/Partner Edition | |||
|
|
Solution Type Technical Instruction Sure Solution 1008033.1 : truss shows a divide by zero fault on Sun [TM] x86 instead of a integer overflow.
PreviouslyPublishedAs 211070 Description Using truss on a solaris x86 platform shows a program taking a divide by zero fault but the divisor register is not zero. Steps to Follow The idiv machine instruction can generate a "divide error" exception for 2 reasons, one is you tried to divide by zero and the other is that the answer overflowed the results register. The solaris kernel maps this exception to the T_DIVZERO trap handler, so truss shows... Incurred fault #8, FLTIZDIV %pc = 0x0805065E siginfo: SIGFPE FPE_INTDIV addr=0x0805065E Received signal #8, SIGFPE [default] siginfo: SIGFPE FPE_INTDIV addr=0x0805065E FLTIZDIV would make you think that the cause was an integer divide by zero but it could be either, you need to attach a debugger and see what the register values are. Product Sun Fire X4600 Server SIGFPE, x86 Previously Published As 86773 Change History Date: 2006-09-04 User Name: 31620 Action: Approved Comment: Verified Metadata - ok Verified Keywords - ok Verified still correct for audience - currently set to contract ** (please see history for a discussion on this) Audience left at contract as per FvF at http://kmo.central/howto/content/voyager-contributor-standards.html Checked review date - currently set to 2007-08-30 Checked for TM - added correct TM for x86 Publishing under the current publication rules of 18 Apr 2005: Version: 3 Date: 2006-09-04 User Name: 31620 Action: Add Comment Comment: ok Chris.. no probs... I'll publish it to the audience it is set to. Just wanted to check... ;-) Regards, Andy Version: 0 Date: 2006-09-04 User Name: 13442 Action: Add Comment Comment: I see no reason to make this internal. There is nothing confidential here and if a customer sees this we would hope they don't call us. Version: 0 Date: 2006-09-04 User Name: 31620 Action: Add Comment Comment: Hi Tim, Chris, Undoubtedly this would be helpful to someone who was involved in diagnosing a fault in this region. I have to ask though, is this article not better suited to be part of our internal collection ? (could be seen to be showing customers problems unnecessarily, and I don't really think customers would be examining code at this level (am prepared to be corrected on that point though)) What do you think guys... OK to make it internal ? Regards, Andy Version: 0 Date: 2006-08-30 User Name: 31620 Action: Accept Comment: Version: 0 Date: 2006-08-30 User Name: 13442 Action: Approved Comment: Looks good. Could save someone scratching their head for a while. Version: 0 Date: 2006-08-30 User Name: 13442 Action: Accept Comment: Version: 0 Date: 2006-08-30 User Name: 13626 Action: Approved Comment: thanks tim Version: 0 Date: 2006-08-30 User Name: 13626 Action: Created Comment: Version: 0 Product_uuid 72cdbb85-7cd3-11da-8990-080020a9ed93|Sun Fire X4600 Server Attachments This solution has no attachment |
||||||||||||
|